Nonclinical precedent Request an invite
Atlas/Bispecific antibodies/Efficacy evidence

Animal model or human cells: efficacy evidence for approved bispecifics

From the FDA and EMA reviews of all 18 approved bispecifics. Each answer links to the regulator's own sentence.

Check my plan against these
Short answer
1 of 18 approved bispecifics never tested the clinical molecule in an animal disease model; 0 rested on human cells or in vitro data alone.
In vivo disease model17/18
In vivo pharmacology, no disease model1/18

Precedent by precedent

18 approved bispecifics, with the reviewers' own words.

Bizengri

zenocutuzumab · HER2 x HER3
Efficacy evidence
Mouse xenografts: HER2+ breast cancer (JIMT-1) and NRG1 fusion-positive lung and pancreatic patient-derived xenografts
“In vivo, zenocutuzumab showed antitumor activity in a HER2-positive breast cancer cell line xenograft model, which was associated with inhibition of HER2:HER3 dimerization and PI3K/Akt signaling.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 57Source ↗
Why that model
Not stated in public reviews

Blincyto

blinatumomab · CD19 x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Blinatumomab in NOD/SCID mouse tumor xenograft models
“Table 1. Summary of in vivo studies in NOD/SCID mice xenograft models”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 22Source ↗
Why that model
Blinatumomab binds only human and chimpanzee CD3/CD19, not mouse, rat, dog or other monkey PBMC
“Blinatumomab bound to B and T lymphocytes from human and chimpanzee peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) but it did not bind to PBMC from the mouse, rat, beagle dog, squirrel monkey, African Green monkey, cynomolgus monkey, rhesus monkey, and baboon.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗

Columvi

glofitamab · CD20 x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Human HSC-engrafted NOG/NSG mice, non-tumor-bearing and tumor-bearing
“In vivo activity was investigated in both non-tumor bearing HSC-NOG mice and in tumor-bearing HSG-NOG and HSG-NSG mice.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 24Source ↗
Why that model
No cross-reactivity with rodent, dog or minipig CD20 or CD3e; monkey is the only cross-reactive species
“The choice of the cynomolgus monkey as the pharmacological and toxicological species is considered justified as comparable cross-reactivity is observed between human and monkey B cells while no cross-reactivity is observed for rodent, dog or minipig CD20 or CD3ε.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 22Source ↗

Elrexfio

elranatamab · BCMA x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Multiple myeloma xenograft models (MM.1S, OPM2, MOLP8) with varying BCMA expression
“The anti-tumor activity of elranatamab was evaluated in MM xenograft models (with MM.1S, OPM2, and MOLP8 cell lines) that had varying levels of BCMA expression.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 52Source ↗
Why that model
Not stated in public reviews

Epkinly

epcoritamab · CD20 x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Human lymphoma cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) mouse models and one patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model
“The in vivo antitumor activity of epcoritamab was evaluated in various human lymphoma cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) mouse models and in one patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 44Source ↗
Why that model
Epcoritamab does not bind dog, pig, rat or mouse CD20
“Epcoritamab bound a cell line transfected with rabbit CD20 (KD=6.93 nM), but did not bind cells expressing dog, pig, rat, or mouse CD20 under the conditions tested.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 43Source ↗

Hemlibra

emicizumab · FIXa x FX
Efficacy evidence
Cynomolgus monkey models of acute and chronic hemophilia A
“The in vivo pharmacological effects of emicizumab were assessed in cynomolgus monkey models of acute and chronic hemophilia A as described below.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 31Source ↗
Why that model
Emicizumab cross-reacts only with monkey (not rat or mouse) FIXa/FX, so hemophilia was induced in monkeys
“In an enzyme assay using purified Cynomolgus monkey, rat and mouse FIXa and FX, emicizumab was found to cross-react only with the corresponding clotting factors of Cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗

Imdelltra

tarlatamab · DLL3 x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Xenograft models in NSG mice injected with activated, expanded human T cells
“As tarlatamab does not cross-react to mouse CD3, the xenograft models used in the nonclinical pharmacology studies were conducted in immunocompromised mice (non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency, interleukin 2 receptor gamma [NSG]) that were injected with activated, expanded human T cells before treatment with tarlatamab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 56Source ↗
Why that model
Tarlatamab does not bind mouse CD3, so human T cells were engrafted into immunodeficient mice
“Because tarlatamab does not bind mouse CD3, the in vivo anti-tumor activity of tarlatamab was evaluated using immunodeficient mice administered human PBMCs or T cells by IV infusion prior to treatment with tarlatamab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗

Kimmtrak

tebentafusp · CD3 x gp100 (TCR fusion)
Efficacy evidence
Mice engrafted with HLA-A*02:01/gp100+ Mel526 human melanoma cells plus human PBMCs; tumor growth inhibition
“In vivo, the anti‐tumor activity of tebentafusp was evaluated in mice engrafted with HLA‐A*02:01/gp100‐positive Mel526 human melanoma cancer cells mixed with PBMCs isolated from human whole blood. In this study, administration of 5 doses of tebentafusp resulted in tumor growth inhibition compared to controls.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 30Source ↗
Why that model
Tebentafusp is specific for human gp100 and CD3 with no affinity for monkey, rat or mouse; no relevant animal species
“Since, tebentafusp is specific for human gp100 and CD3 with no affinity to e.g. monkey, rat or mice, secondary and safety pharmacology was evaluated using in vitro methods on human tissues and cells..”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 25Source ↗

Korjuny

catumaxomab · EpCAM x CD3
Efficacy evidence
SCID mouse i.p. human ovarian carcinoma ascites xenograft treated with human PBMCs plus catumaxomab
“In vivo pharmacology of catumaxomab was investigated in a xenograft model of malignant ascites in immuno-deficient SCID mice. Mice received a human ovarian carcinoma xenograft i.p. and were treated one day later with human PBMCs (i.p.) together with a single i.p. injection of catumaxomab.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Why that model
Catumaxomab does not react with murine CD3, so surrogate BiLu was used for syngeneic proof of concept
“Due to the lack of catumaxomab reactivity with murine CD3, the variant antibody BiLu (anti-human EpCAM & anti-mouse CD3) was used to demonstrate proof of concept in syngeneic mouse tumour models expressing human EpCAM.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗

Lynozyfic

linvoseltamab · BCMA x CD3
Efficacy evidence
NSG mice co-implanted with human PBMC and NCI-H929 or MOLP-8 myeloma xenografts
“In vivo studies were performed to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy and minimum effective dose of linvoseltamab in immunodeficient NSG mice SC co-implanted with human PBMC and either NCI-H929 (BCMA-high) or MOLP-8 (BCMA-low) MM cells.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 74Source ↗
Why that model
Binds human and cynomolgus monkey BCMA but not rat or mouse BCMA
“Overall, data indicate that linvoseltamab bound human and Cynomolgus monkey BCMA, but not rat or mouse BCMA.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗

Ordspono

odronextamab · CD20 x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Lymphoma tumour models in humanized (BRG) mice and immunodeficient NSG mice
“The applicant has submitted 3 in vivo studies utilising two in vivo mouse models, consisting of humanized (BRG) mice and immunodeficient NSG mice, to evaluate antitumour activities of odronextamab in a repeat-dose setting.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Why that model
No binding to rat or mouse CD3 or CD20
“Odronextamab was not able to bind to rat or mouse CD3 or CD20.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗

Removab

catumaxomab · EpCAM x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Human ovarian carcinoma xenograft (catumaxomab); syngeneic human-EpCAM mouse tumour model with surrogate BiLu
“The variant antibody BiLu (anti-human EpCAM & anti-mouse CD3) was used to demonstrate proof of concept in a syngeneic mouse tumour model expressing human EpCAM. Anti-tumour activity of catumaxomab was observed in a human ovarian carcinoma xenograft study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 12Source ↗
Why that model
Binding properties essentially specific for humans
“The non-clinical programme was adapted to the fact that catumaxomab is a protein, and its binding properties are essentially specific for humans.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 10Source ↗

Rybrevant

amivantamab · EGFR x MET
Efficacy evidence
Patient-derived tumor xenografts with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in mice
“In mice bearing patient derived tumors with exon 20 insertion mutations, administration of intraperitoneal (i.p.) amivantamab twice weekly resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and complete responses in several animals, as did cetuximab and osimertinib.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 36Source ↗
Why that model
Human cell xenografts used; amivantamab does not interact with murine c-Met or EGFR
“For the pharmacology efficacy studies, mouse models with human cell xenografts were used, and Amivantamab did not exhibit any interaction with murine c-Met or EGFR in cross-reactivity studies while beneficial properties against human c-Met or EGFR have been shown, which is satisfactory.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗

Talvey

talquetamab · GPRC5D x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Myeloma cell line xenografts (H929 prophylactic; MM.1S, RPMI 8226 established) in humanized immunodeficient mice
“The in vivo antitumor activity of talquetamab was evaluated in cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) mouse models. These studies evaluated the prevention of tumorigenesis in a prophylactic model (H929 cell line) and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) in established tumor models (MM.1S and RPMI 8226 cell lines).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 43Source ↗
Why that model
No binding to murine CD3, so efficacy mice were humanized with human PBMCs or T-cells
“Talquetamab does not bind murine CD3; therefore, the CDX studies were conducted in immunodeficient mice that were humanized by intravenous (IV) implantation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or human T-cells.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 43Source ↗

Tecvayli

teclistamab · BCMA x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Human MM xenografts (H929, RPMI-8226) in human PBMC/T-cell-engrafted NSG mice
“Teclistamab conferred dose-dependent antitumor activity in both xenograft mouse models of MM.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 37Source ↗
Why that model
No cross-reactivity with rodent CD3, weak rodent BCMA binding; humanized immunodeficient mice used
“Teclistamab binds only weakly to rodent BCMA and does not cross-react with rodent or rabbit CD3.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗

Vabysmo

faricimab · VEGF-A x Ang-2
Efficacy evidence
Laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (nAMD model) in cynomolgus monkeys, IVT faricimab vs ranibizumab
“In a laser-induced model of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in cynomolgus monkeys, faricimab reduced the formation of CNV and subsequent injury to the retina due to lesion formation to a significantly greater degree compared to anti-VEGF-A monoclonal antibody (mAb) alone.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 18Source ↗
Why that model
No rodent DME model: faricimab reacts with human, not rodent, VEGF-A
“An alternative rodent model for DME was not tested because the antibody in question reacts with human VEGF-A antigen and not with rodent, so classical animal models of diabetes could not work according to the applicant.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗

Ziihera

zanidatamab · HER2 x HER2 (biparatopic)
Efficacy evidence
HER2 3+ xenografts in nude mice (SKOV-3, NCI-N87, patient-derived GXA 3054); no effect in HER2-negative model
“In a third assay, the antitumour activity of a single high dose level of zanidatamab was evaluated in GXA 3054, a patient-derived HER2 3+ gastric cancer xenograft model in nude mice (ZW25-29).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗
Why that model
Not stated in public reviews

Lunsumio

mosunetuzumab · CD20 x CD3
Efficacy evidence
Human CD20/CD3 double-transgenic mice: peripheral and tissue B-cell depletion and T-cell activation (comparable to analogue 2H7v16/40G5c)
“In the double-transgenic mouse model, it was also shown that 2H7v16/40G5c and mosunetuzumab have comparable profiles in potently depleting peripheral and tissue B cells as well as activation of T cells.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗
Why that model
Cross-reacts with CD20 and CD3 in humans and cynomolgus monkeys but not in rodents
“2H7v16/40G5c displays the same properties as mosunetuzumab, as it cross-reacts with CD20 and CD3 in both humans and cynomolgus monkeys, but not in rodents.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗