Request an invite
Atlas/Gene therapy/Skipped studies

Which nonclinical studies did approved gene therapies skip?

From the FDA and EMA reviews of all 26 approved gene therapies. Each answer links to the regulator's own sentence.

Check my plan against these
Short answer
26 of 26 skipped carcinogenicity; 21 of 26 skipped genotoxicity.
No genotoxicity studies21/26
No carcinogenicity study26/26
No dedicated repro tox20/26

Precedent by precedent

26 approved gene therapies, with the reviewers' own words.

Adstiladrin

nadofaragene firadenovec · IFN-alpha2b (adenovirus, intravesical)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted for rAd-IFN; conducted for excipient Syn3 only (Ames and chromosome aberration, negative)
“Safety pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and genotoxicity studies were also conducted for the exicipient Syn3.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted by product characteristics, tox results, target population)
“Carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity studies were not performed for rAd”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (not warranted by product characteristics, tox results, target population)
“Carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity studies were not performed for rAd”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗

Beqvez

fidanacogene elaparvovec · Factor IX
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (classical); vector integration site analysis in dog and NHP liver instead
“Based on the IS profile, genotoxicity from vector integration appears to be a low risk.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 39Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted given product characteristics, BD/tox data, population)
“Studies to evaluate the safety pharmacology, developmental and reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity of BEQVEZ were not conducted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (male-only population); rabbit semen shedding/germline study only
“This reviewer agrees that the omission of dedicated embryo-fetal development studies and pre- and postnatal development studies is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 20Source ↗

Casgevy

exagamglogene autotemcel · BCL11A enhancer (CRISPR-Cas9, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
No conventional studies; specialized on-/off-target editing (GUIDE-seq, in silico, hybrid capture) and chromosomal aberration assessments
“No evidence of off-target editing was observed for in-silico and GUIDE-seq identified candidate off-target sites which were assessed by hybrid capture sequencing analyses.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (tumorigenicity evaluated in 20-week NSG study; no tumors)
“No carcinogenicity studies were conducted with CTX001.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 34Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (no reproductive organ findings, low gonadal distribution, non-integrating editing)
“No DART studies were conducted with CTX001.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 34Source ↗

Elevidys

delandistrogene moxeparvovec · Micro-dystrophin
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (low-frequency random AAV integration per literature)
“Per the applicant, genotoxicity studies have not been conducted with SRP-9001 because the literature thus far, supports random integration of AAV vector into the host genome at low frequencies”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 48Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (no cancers in AAV clinical trials; dystrophin possible tumor suppressor)
“Based on the indication of X-linked DMD which occurs primarily in males and lack of concerning findings in the completed toxicology studies, further assessment of developmental and reproductive toxicology, carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity, and genotoxicity are not warranted at this time.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 48Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (male population, no reproductive lesions); neonatal juvenile tox done; low germline signal in testes
“Animal reproductive and developmental toxicity and carcinogenicity studies were not conducted with ELEVIDYS, which is acceptable based on the patient population and lack of ELEVIDYS-related adverse findings in the toxicology studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 12Source ↗

Fayuvi

rebisufligene etisparvovec · SGSH (AAV9)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence risk assessment used
“Developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART), genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity studies were not conducted with FAYUVI.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence risk assessment used
“Developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART), genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity studies were not conducted with FAYUVI.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence risk assessment used
“Developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART), genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity studies were not conducted with FAYUVI.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗

Genglycos

pariglasgene brecaparvovec · G6PC (AAV8)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (low AAV integration risk); vector integration assessed in germline transmission study
“studies were not conducted to evaluate genotoxicity as they expect that the risk of DTX401 insertion is low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 11Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (AAV8 predominantly episomal; no link between AAV integration and hepatic tumors)
“studies were not conducted to evaluate carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 11Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Embryo-fetal development and germline transmission studies in mice; NOAEL 7.0x10^13 gc/kg; no germline integration
“IV administration of DTX401 at 7 × 1013 gc/kg to pregnant dams at presumed gestational day (GD) 6 resulted in DTX401 DNA detection in placenta but not offspring livers”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗

Glybera

alipogene tiparvovec · LPL (AAV1)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (standard tests not relevant); integration studies (LAM-PCR, nrLAM-PCR) instead
“Standard genotoxicity studies, as applied to a conventional chemical drug, are not relevant for this type of product and were not performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted; integration analyses argued sufficient (97% episomal, <2% near-random integration)
“Carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted. The applicant argues that the studies conducted to assess integration are sufficient to address risk of carcinogenicity.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Mouse repro study: no effects on female reproduction or fetal development; male breeding study showed no paternal germline transmission
“Reproductive toxicity was studied in pregnant mice in whom no effects of female reproduction or fetal development were detected.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗

Hemgenix

etranacogene dezaparvovec · Factor IX
Genotoxicity
Not conducted as standard battery; integration site analysis (LAM-PCR) in mouse and NHP liver showed low random integration
“For both species, the majority of the identified vector DNA sequences represented episomal forms that were not integrated into the host DNA.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted based on nonclinical safety profile)
“Studies to evaluate the carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity of HEMGENIX were not conducted. These studies are not warranted based on the nonclinical safety profile.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Paternal germline transmission/fertility study in male mice only; no transmission, no fertility effects; EFD/PPND not required
“However, there were no adverse effects on mating rates or fertility indices.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗

Imlygic

talimogene laherparepvec · GM-CSF (oncolytic HSV-1)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (ICH S6(R1))
“In accordance with ICH S6(R1) guideline, genotoxicity studies were not conducted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted; literature review of HSV-1 epidemiology provided
“No carcinogenicity studies have been conducted (see non-clinical discussion).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Mouse embryo-fetal study (IV, up to 4e8 PFU/kg) no effects; adult reproductive tissues unaffected; no fertility/PPND studies
“No effects on embryo-foetal development were observed when talimogene laherparepvec was administered during organogenesis to pregnant mice at doses up to 4 x 108 (400 million) PFU/kg”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗

Itvisma

onasemnogene abeparvovec (intrathecal) · SMN1 (AAV9, intrathecal)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile)
“These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Mouse FEED (single IV OAV101B): no fertility effects, no germline transmission; mouse EFD NOAEL 1.1x10^14 vg/kg
“Fertility and early embryonic development (FEED) studies were conducted in healthy male and female FVB mice administered a single intravenous injection of OAV101B. There were no reported adverse effects on fertility, fecundity, or mating behaviors in either sex.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗

Kebilidi

eladocagene exuparvovec · AADC
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (agreed with CHMP; low integration risk in post-mitotic neurons)
“It was previously agreed with CHMP that genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and evaluation of insertional mutagenesis studies were not required (EMEA/CHMP/SAWP/236092/2018).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (product characteristics and patient population)
“Studies to evaluate the safety pharmacology, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity of KEBLIDI were not conducted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (local brain delivery, no systemic exposure or gonadal distribution)
“Given the local administration of eladocagene exuparvovec to the brain and lack of systemic exposure, and the absence of biodistribution to the gonads, the risk for germline transmission is low.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗

Kresladi

marnetegragene autotemcel · ITGB2 (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Integration site analyses only (mouse and human transduced cells); no standard genotoxicity battery
“8 Analysis of Integration Profile in Mouse Transduced Cells NSR-8 9 Analysis of Integration Profile in Human Transduced Cells NSR-9”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not suitable for product type); no tumorigenicity or preferential oncogene integration observed
“Traditional carcinogenicity studies were not conducted since they are not suitable for assessment of this drug product type.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (product type; gonadal VCN near background, low germline transmission risk)
“Studies were not conducted to evaluate this developmental and reproductive toxicity based on the product type and due to the lack of concerning findings in reproductive tissues in Study #7 (study report no. NSR-7).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 25Source ↗

Lenmeldy

atidarsagene autotemcel · ARSA (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Conducted: integration site analysis, in vitro immortalization assay, tumor-prone Cdkn2a-/- mouse; no insertional transformation
“Genotoxicity risk was assessed in vitro using hHSPCs derived from healthy donors and MLD patients and showed no effects of LVV transduction or ARSA overexpression on the proliferation or differentiation of hHSPCs.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted); tumorigenicity assessed within GLP mouse study
“Carcinogenicity and developmental and reproductive toxicity studies were not conducted with OTL-200.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (ex vivo transduction; germline transduction risk very limited)
“No dedicated reproductive and developmental studies are undertaken.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗

Luxturna

voretigene neparvovec · RPE65
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (AAV low integration frequency; limited systemic exposure)
“studies to evaluate safety pharmacology, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity were not conducted for AAV2-hRPE65v2.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (post-mitotic retinal target; low insertional mutagenesis risk)
“Thus, the risk for AAV vector-induced insertional mutagenesis/carcinogenesis, particularly in post-mitotic cells such as retinal cells, is considered low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (limited systemic distribution; no vector DNA in gonads of dogs/NHPs)
“The presence of AAV2-hRPE65v2 was not detected by qPCR in the gonads of healthy NHPs following subretinal administration.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 25Source ↗

Lyfgenia

lovotibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Insertional mutagenesis assessed: in vitro immortalization (IVIM) assay and integration site analyses; low risk
“Per the applicant, based on these data, the risk of insertional mutagenesis following BB305 transduction is low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 24Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (acceptable based on product type)
“No traditional carcinogenicity studies were conducted with lovo-cel which is acceptable based on the product type.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (no reproductive tissue findings in mouse studies; busulfan risk addressed in label)
“Per the applicant, developmental and reproductive toxicology studies were not conducted because there were no adverse findings in the male and female reproductive tissues of mice administered mBMCs transduced with BB305 LVV”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 22Source ↗

Otarmeni

lunsotogene parvec · OTOF (AAV, intracochlear)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (low AAV insertional mutagenesis risk; limited distribution beyond inner ear)
“No genotoxicity studies have been conducted with DB-OTO. The risk of insertional mutagenesis with recombinant AAV vectors is considered to be low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (local distribution, no clinical AAV carcinogenesis evidence)
“No carcinogenicity studies have been conducted with DB-OTO.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 17Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; gonadal biodistribution/expression assessed in tox studies (negligible, no findings)
“Across these nonclinical studies, there was negligible biodistribution of DB-OTO vector to the gonads, no expression of hOTOF mRNA in the gonads, and no gross or microscopic findings in the gonads, suggesting a low reproductive and germline integration risk.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 16Source ↗

Papzimeos

zopapogene imadenovec · HPV6/11 antigens (gorilla adenovirus)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (non-integrating, replication-incompetent adenovector; no insertional mutagenesis)
“PRGN-2012 does not rely on host cell genome integration for expression of the transgene, thus, it has a reduced genotoxic risk and will not result in insertional mutagenesis or position-effect variation.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (non-integrating adenovector; no significant human tumorigenicity history)
“Per the applicant, studies were not conducted to evaluate carcinogenicity as adenovectors are non-integrating. Therefore, the risk for insertional mutagenesis is not a major concern.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (predictable local adenovector biodistribution, species C-like vector); reviewer agreed
“This reviewer agrees with the rationale provided by the applicant for not conducting developmental and reproductive toxicology studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 13Source ↗

Roctavian

valoctocogene roxaparvovec · Factor VIII
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (literature on AAV); NHP liver integration site analysis: 1.55x10^-3 IS/cell, no clonal expansion
“In terms of genotoxicity, no studies were performed with BMN 270.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (product characteristics, tox results, population)
“As regards carcinogenicity: no carcinogenicity studies were performed with BMN 270.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (DART); male mouse germline transmission/mating studies showed no F1 transmission or fertility effects
“There were no ROCTAVIAN-related adverse changes on mating rates, maternal behavior, and fertility indices.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 12Source ↗

Skysona

elivaldogene autotemcel · ABCD1 (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Standard genotox not relevant; insertional mutagenesis assessed by in vitro immortalization assay and integration site analysis
“Lenti-D is an autologous human cellular product, therefore, standard genotoxicity studies are not considered relevant.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (traditional studies unsuitable for product); ISA on engrafted marrow instead
“Traditional carcinogenicity studies were not conducted as they are not suitable for assessing this product type.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 17Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; no findings in reproductive tissues in mouse GLP study
“Studies were not conducted to evaluate this safety endpoint based on the product type and due to the lack of findings in reproductive tissues in Study #10.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 16Source ↗

Strimvelis

autologous CD34+ cells transduced with ADA (no INN) · ADA (gamma-retroviral, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (conventional assays cannot detect insertional events)
“Conventional genotoxicity assays are inappropriate to detect insertional events and would not provide additional information to inform a quantitative risk assessment in humans and hence no studies have been conducted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 26Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (no adequate model; long-term engraftment of transduced cells in mice not achievable); relies on clinical follow-up
“Accordingly, the SmPC states that carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted as no adequate animal model was available to evaluate the tumourigenic potential of Strimvelis due to the inability to achieve long-term engraftment of transduced cells in mice.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; gonad histopathology in biodistribution study (busulfan-related atrophy); germline risk via clinical monitoring
“No reproductive or developmental toxicity studies were conducted with GSK2696273.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗

Tudriqev

vusolimogene oderparepvec · GALV-GP + GM-CSF (oncolytic HSV-1)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (not warranted based on product characteristics and safety profile)
“Studies to evaluate the safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of TUDRIQEV were not conducted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 14Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted)
“Studies to evaluate the safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of TUDRIQEV were not conducted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 14Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Embryofetal study in pregnant rats (mRP1 IV, GD 4-16): no malformations or growth effects; minimal placental transfer
“no embryofetal structural abnormalities or adverse effects on embryofetal growth were observed following repeat IV mRP1 administration.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗

Vyjuvek

beremagene geperpavec · COL7A1 (HSV-1, topical)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (HSV-1 does not integrate; negligible insertional mutagenesis)
“No traditional genotoxicity studies were performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence literature risk assessment
“No carcinogenicity studies were performed, and the applicant provided a weight of evidence risk assessment”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (acceptable given product characteristics and safety profile)
“Animal reproductive and developmental toxicity (DART) studies were not conducted with VYJUVEK.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗

Waskyra

etuvetidigene autotemcel · WAS (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Conventional mutagenicity not conducted; IVIM assay, vector insertion site analysis and VITA performed, no genotoxic potential
“No mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity studies have been performed with WASKYRA”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not suited to product); tumorigenicity assessed in mouse toxicity and serial transplant studies up to 16 months
“While, standard carcinogenicity studies are usually not required due to the nature of the advanced medicinal product”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; no vector in testes, no treatment-related effect on reproductive organs in mouse surrogate study
“No carcinogenicity, developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART) studies, and safety pharmacology studies were conducted for WASKYRA.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗

Zevaskyn

prademagene zamikeracel · COL7A1 (RV-modified keratinocyte sheets)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (integration site analysis in transduced RDEB keratinocytes instead; no clonality or oncogene preference)
“Integration site analysis (ISA) was performed on RDEB keratinocytes (n=6 donors) transduced with RVV. ISA did not indicate clonality at 6-days post-keratinocyte transduction.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (no neoplastic histology, low insertional oncogenesis risk, routine SCC screening in RDEB)
“Carcinogenicity and tumorigenicity studies of ZEVASKYN were not conducted due to absence of neoplastic features on histology, low risk of insertional oncogenesis, and frequent SCC screening recommended for all subjects with RDEB.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (vector biodistribution confined to the implanted product)
“Developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies of ZEVASKYN were not conducted due to the BD of RVV remaining confined to representative nonclinical products.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗

Zolgensma

onasemnogene abeparvovec · SMN1
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (low random rAAV integration per literature)
“Recent scientific literature supports low random integration frequencies of recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors1,2 and lack of hepatic genotoxicity in rAAV2/5 genome integration in NHP and human liver samples.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (no tumors in clinical trials since 2013)
“Ongoing clinical trials (under IND #15699) since September 2013 have shown no evidence of tumor formation clinically in any subject administered with AVXS-101.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (infants sexually immature, low gonadal vector); label later reports mouse fertility study without effects
“The target patient population for AVXS-101 with infantile-onset SMA are typically less than 1 year of age and sexually immature.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗

Zynteglo

betibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Genotoxicity
Insertional mutagenesis assessed instead of standard genotox: in vitro immortalization assay (low potential) and integration site analysis (no clonal dominance)
“Results from an in vitro immortalization (IVIM) assay performed with BB305 LVV-transduced murine BMCs showed low mutagenic potential of BB305 LVV.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted; insertional mutagenesis risk assessed by IVIM/ISA)
“Carcinogenicity and developmental and reproductive toxicity studies were not conducted with beti-cel.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; no adverse findings in reproductive tissues of mice given murine product
“No developmental and/or reproductive toxicity (DART) studies were submitted to support the use of Zynteglo for the treatment of TDT.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗